Z.ai benchmarks.
A lab-level profile for Z.ai, covering tracked models, category leaders, open/proprietary mix, speed, value, source coverage, and portfolio depth.
Lab rank
#4
By available Arena average
Models tracked
8
7 open-weight models
Portfolio coverage
54%
Average matched benchmark signals
Fastest model
0.62s
GLM 4.7
Lab profile
Portfolio shape, leaders, and model coverage.
The lab page now starts with the portfolio read, then drills into category leaders, value rankings, and model-level coverage rather than repeating source panels.
Portfolio read
Z.ai has 8 tracked benchmark profiles.
The portfolio combines 1 proprietary models and 7 open-weight models. Its average available Arena rank is 48.3, with a best category rank of #4. Average profile coverage is 54%, so model-level gaps remain visible in the cards below.
Best Arena model
GLM 5.2
Best category rank #4
Highest coverage
GLM 5
67% matched signals
Fastest response
GLM 4.7
0.62s first token
Category leaders
Best model by benchmark lens.
Each card shows the highest-ranked model from this lab in a composite benchmark suite, with the global rank and index left intact.
Value
Quality, price, latency, and speed
GLM 5.2
value index
Coding
Code Arena, SWE-bench, and output speed
GLM 5.2
coding index
Agents
Search, document, code, and latency
GLM 4.6v
agent proxy
Reasoning
Text, document, vision, and mode signals
GLM 5.1
reasoning proxy
Context
Document, search, and text proxy
GLM 5.1
context proxy
Z.ai value ranking table
Models from this lab with both quality and commercial price matches.
Top 7 of 7
| Rank | Model | Index | Price | Latency | Speed | Quality | Sources |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| #8 | 71value index | $3.16blended / 1M tokens | 1.09stime to first token | 75 tok/soutput speed | 69quality signal | ArenaArtificial Analysis | |
| #10 | 71value index | $2.15blended / 1M tokens | 1.06stime to first token | 65 tok/soutput speed | 66quality signal | ArenaArtificial Analysis | |
| #37 | 63value index | $1.55blended / 1M tokens | 1.59stime to first token | 54 tok/soutput speed | 50quality signal | ArenaArtificial Analysis | |
| #47 | 60value index | $1.00blended / 1M tokens | 0.62stime to first token | 115 tok/soutput speed | 42quality signal | ArenaArtificial Analysis | |
| #73 | 50value index | $0.981blended / 1M tokens | 1.24stime to first token | 63 tok/soutput speed | 25quality signal | ArenaArtificial Analysis | |
| #76 | 49value index | $0.450blended / 1M tokens | 1.03stime to first token | 58 tok/soutput speed | 22quality signal | ArenaArtificial Analysis | |
| #79 | 47value index | $0.900blended / 1M tokens | 1.08stime to first token | 39 tok/soutput speed | 18quality signal | ArenaArtificial Analysis |
Model portfolio
Z.ai model coverage map.
Every tracked model keeps its best Arena rank, coverage score, commercial metrics, and suite placement visible in one scannable grid.
GLM 5.2
glm-5.2 (max)
Coverage
56%
Best Arena
#4
Code
Value
#8
value index
Coding
#14
coding index
Latency
1.09s
75 tok/s
GLM 5.1
glm-5.1
Coverage
56%
Best Arena
#15
Code
Value
#10
value index
Coding
#29
coding index
Latency
1.06s
65 tok/s
GLM 5v Turbo
glm-5v-turbo
Coverage
44%
Best Arena
#32
Docs
Value
Not listed
No price match
Coding
#47
coding index
Latency
Not listed
Not listed
GLM 4.7
glm-4.7
Coverage
56%
Best Arena
#34
Code
Value
#47
value index
Coding
#51
coding index
Latency
0.62s
115 tok/s
GLM 5
glm-5
Coverage
67%
Best Arena
#41
Code
Value
#37
value index
Coding
#19
coding index
Latency
1.59s
54 tok/s
GLM 4.6
glm-4.6
Coverage
67%
Best Arena
#68
Code
Value
#73
value index
Coding
#62
coding index
Latency
1.24s
63 tok/s
GLM 4.6v
glm-4.6v
Coverage
44%
Best Arena
#78
Vision
Value
#76
value index
Coding
#109
coding index
Latency
1.03s
58 tok/s
GLM 4.5v
glm-4.5v
Coverage
44%
Best Arena
#85
Vision
Value
#79
value index
Coding
#112
coding index
Latency
1.08s
39 tok/s
