Benchmark suiteLatest source data: Oct 16, 2026Checked: October 18, 2026

Tencent benchmarks.

A lab-level profile for Tencent, covering tracked models, category leaders, open/proprietary mix, speed, value, source coverage, and portfolio depth.

Lab rank

#11

By available Arena average

Models tracked

2

2 open-weight models

Portfolio coverage

22%

Average matched benchmark signals

Fastest model

Not listed

Lab profile

Portfolio shape, leaders, and model coverage.

The lab page now starts with the portfolio read, then drills into category leaders, value rankings, and model-level coverage rather than repeating source panels.

Portfolio read

Tencent has 2 tracked benchmark profiles.

Lab #11

The portfolio combines 0 proprietary models and 2 open-weight models. Its average available Arena rank is 50, with a best category rank of #18. Average profile coverage is 22%, so model-level gaps remain visible in the cards below.

Best Arena model

Hy4 Preview

Best category rank #18

Highest coverage

Hy3

33% matched signals

Fastest response

Not listed

No latency match

Access mix

Open versus proprietary

Proprietary

0 / 0%

Open weights

2 / 100%

Value leader

Hy3

Category leaders

Best model by benchmark lens.

Each card shows the highest-ranked model from this lab in a composite benchmark suite, with the global rank and index left intact.

Tencent value ranking table

Models from this lab with both quality and commercial price matches.

Top 1 of 1

#72
Hy3

hy3

TencentOpen weights
50value index
Price
$0.100blended / 1M tokens
Latency
Not listedtime to first token
Speed
Not listedoutput speed
Quality
23quality signal
ArenaArtificial Analysis

Model portfolio

Tencent model coverage map.

Every tracked model keeps its best Arena rank, coverage score, commercial metrics, and suite placement visible in one scannable grid.